EXAMINE THIS REPORT ON CASE LAW ON SECTION 395 PPC CONVICTIONS

Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Blog Article

five.  Learned Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel to the complainant further argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led into the recovery of sleeping tablets on fourteen.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has become created before the Court wherein the sleeping products were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected during the liver although not inside the tummy. That's why, the recovery of mentioned sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Discovered Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel for that complainant have also argued that during the investigation of the case the petitioner Bhoora led on the recovery of the motorcycle.

The main focus is around the intention to cause injury. This is really a major difficulty: an incredibly low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.

V)      During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal towards the deceased was caused with the petitioner but in support of opinion in the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is offered around the file and mere ipsi dixit of police will not be binding about the Court.

Note: Please fill any industry and Click on Search button, If you don't know the complete information please leave subject blank.

criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced to your period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a perfectly-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

Upholding Justice: The application of the legislation as more info well as subsequent punishment with the guilty party provide a feeling of closure and justice to your sufferer’s family and loved ones.

13. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is founded along with the employee is found guilty after due process of law, it's the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the varied penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not really proportionate with the seriousness from the act of misconduct is not really sufficient though the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful way. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Carrying out a case regulation search might be as easy as entering specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case legislation searches, like:

[3] For example, in England, the High Court and the Court of Appeals are each bound by their possess previous decisions, however, since the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, Despite the fact that in practice it hardly ever does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent is definitely the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court on the United Kingdom ruled that it along with the other courts of England and Wales had misapplied the regulation for nearly 30 years.

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition into the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter to be a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) with the Pakistan Constitution supplies original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to just take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are proven by executive agencies based on statutes.

Report this page